Makes me wonder why CI is offering free info. Do you know that even if you are a CI subscriber, they won't let you navigate archival info on their site? I think that particular policy is a bit of a ripoff.
Christopher Kimball can be more than a bit annoying with his editorials but the information held in the magazine itself is outstanding and consistent. The trick is to skip his rambling personal story every month and that really clears the way to enjoy the rest of the magazine. My favorite name for him is "Mr. Soppypants."
I think he should have relinquished his position as cookbook reviewer when he picked up the baton as cookbook author. His reviews are more than a bit slanted. He can't seem to wear a non-biased hat.
I think it was Julia Child who first introduced me (not personally, though) to the "let them sit covered off the heat" method -- so I guess I've been using it for over 30 years. IT NEVER FAILS. Even if the eggs sit in the water longer, since the water is also cooling, they don't get too terribly overcooked. And you never have to worry about the eggs exploding because you forgot about them on the stove and all the water boiled out. It always amazed me when fellow line cooks would boil the **** out of eggs, when this method is so much better -- I even almost had a fight over it once!
Susanne, boiling any protein will toughen it, not just eggs. You're right, they're wrong.
Chiffonade, unless they have just changed their policy, CI archives are accessible. You just have to reset the time frame (at the bottom, I think.) That for me was the beauty of the site. (my subscription has just expired). If it has changed, let me know and I probably wont re-subscribe.
I think in other fields it is customary to have novelists review novelists, historians review historians, etc. The important thing is to recognize the reviewers' biases. In the case of Kimball, his are pretty easily read. In the CI recipes I often disagree with the goal they wish to achieve in a particular recipe (soft chocolate chip cookies? Faugh!), but their meticulous documentation helps me find the way to my own. OK, no stones from the soft cookie crowd,k please.
I also appreciate that they try to make each recipe work as universally as possible no matter what quality equipement you have. And that when they test products, more money doesn't mean it's better.
I like the fact that I can go to one primary source and expect a certain methodology by which information is derived. Of course CI is not the "end all". If nothing else, it teaches some of us who would not necessarily know or care about a topic until addressed. For others, it challenges us to support our own methods and/or consider and/or incorporate new ones. It is impossible to please everyone and I don't think that is their goal. I think they do the best they can with the materials and methods and time constraints allotted. I don't think it's right to disregard everything they write simply because I completely disagree with one article. How many times have we made a dish knowing we could have used a better ingredient, or if only we'd had more time and we are unfortunately judged based on that meal? Or how many times have we done that to someone else (thinking they can't cook!).
People approach cooking in different ways and they learn in different ways. I believe CI appeals to people of a very logical mindset. Not everyone has to agree with them but that's like any other publication on any other subject. I don't see much competition on the market which fills the niche CI does. I think it would be fantastic if Shirley O. Corriher who wrote CookWise had her own show on FoodTV. Until then, I'll have to stick with shows like America's Test Kitchen and Good Eats to answer those questions I've wondered about, those I'd never even considered, and educate me enough to make me ask some more...
Alexia...I don't know what I did different...I was looking for a recipe from a magazine I own but didn't want to sift through my pile of CI's. They asked me for payment! I e-mailed and asked if my subscription (since the charter issue, I might add), didn't get me access to all areas of information. They said a user had to "join the website." I think that's ridiculous.
As for the content - I believe CI is one of the finest resources available. I have read them cover to cover since way back but I got a little disappointed in the overall tone of Kimball's reviews. I've seen him cut down tried and true books - with no real merit.
but, I got one of those little Salton egg cooker and they just come out so perfect and peel so easily and NO green sulfur ring around the yolk. Yes I know that that is from to high of heat, but I don't like to watch a pot boil or even try to get to that point and it probably is not large enough to use in a large kitchen, but if you want about a dozen at a time for recipe purposes it's a fun item. I'm not a purist, so shoot me.
Welcome to ChefTalk. There's almost always more than one way to achieve the same result! I'm just not sure I'd hard boil enough eggs to justify the purchase of an egg cooker or have the room to store it.