The Malady That is the Modern Cooking Show

  1. I recently read an interesting article from the Huffington Post.  In this article, the author explains and espouses her belief that food TV is a terrible way to be a fan of food.  I could not agree more.  Most of the programing that makes up today's food TV takes the focus away from the food and squarely on the people around the food.  When I was in culinary school I remember at the orientation the chefs telling us that if we watched and enjoyed watching the Food Network that chances were we would change our minds by the time we were done.  How right they were.

    The food TV that I have most problems with can be categorized into three categories: food wars (competitive), food porn (voyeuristic), and food celebrity.  For the sake of full disclosure, I will say that I don't dislike all food TV and enjoy some shows such as actually cooking shows or anything done by Anthony Bourdain.  It is just that today's food TV seems to be more about flash than substance.  It is all insincere, fake and more often than not feels forced.  It plays out like bad TV.

    The category I dislike the most is the food wars.  Shows like Hell's Kitchen, Next Food Network Star, or even Chopped eliminate everything that is good and beautiful about preparing delicious food.  They place people in artificial environments with the goal of outdoing each other for the ever slight chance of riches or glory.  It brings out and showcases the worst of people.  It also destroys one key element of working in a real kitchen.  Teamwork.  A real kitchen cannot and will not function if the attitude is everyone only looking out for themselves.  The kitchen can only work if everyone is pulling towards the same goal.  While you might not always get along with your kitchen makes at all times, teamwork is fundamental for producing your food.  You all have one objective and are pulling in the same direction. Without this you might as well just shut down your kitchen.

    Another reason I really dislike food wars is because of the ultimately subjective nature of the judgement.  I am not saying things can't be appraised, especially absolutes such as if chicken is undercooked and still pink.  What I am saying is that more often than not it comes down to peoples opinions.  I have seen two judges on the same show having the exact opposite critique about a dish.  Now I know that someone is always judging food, whether it be the executive chef at a real kitchen or ultimately the customer eating the food. What bothers me about the judgement levied on these shows is that they are trying to quantify things with made up values.  More often than not these judgements are passed down by people who have an air of superiority that really should not be there. All of this is done to once again add the dramatization of the show which feeds into the artificiality of it all.

    Food porn is more about the spectacle of eating than the food itself.  Shows like Man vs Food or even Bizarre Foods fall into this category.  The food in these shows only serves as a vehicle for outlandish characters and circumstances in which the food is eaten.  It is never about look at this food and how delicious it is, but rather about look at how ridiculous this is due to the shear quantity of food or because it is something that the viewers don't normally eat.

    Last we come to the celebrity food.  In this case, the food takes a back seat to the person who is making/presenting the food.  Here it is all about the celebrity in front of the camera.  What they make does not matter as long as they have a great catch phrase, eccentric hair, or an outlandish personality so big it has its own trailer on the set of the show.  The fact that the show they are in happens to be about food is just happenstance.  Big personalities of people making cooking shows is nothing new.  Just look at Julia Child.  The thing is that with her you never got the impression that she wanted most of the attention.  She just wanted to show people how to make good food.  The roles of her and the food are reversed than what you find on most cooking shows now.

    Do I hate food TV.  No, I really don't.  I just dislike what it has become.  I still enjoy shows that focus on the food.  Shows that are informative and leave me feeling like I learned something are also great.  Unfortunately in today's world of reality TV I'm afraid the good food shows are just becoming harder and harder to find.

    Share This Article

    1 person likes this.

Comments

To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!
  1. tsuck nets
    i don't know how many of you are from out of the us but as an outsider let me tell you. you have it good where i come from (Israel) the only food shows are reality shows and food wars.
  2. tomb
    I watch many cooking programmes ( including Foodnetwork shows) but, my American friends, if you would like to see something which many of us in Britain watch every Saturday morning, try a search for BBC.co.uk/Saturday Morning Kitchen -- James Martin entertains, instructs, encourages, speaks to listeners in real-time -- worth viewing, no matter one's personal preference in cooking progs !
  3. genemachine
    This pretty much touched what I feel about cooking programmes. I absolutely like the when they are about food and about good eating. I adore Pepin, I like J. Oliver for his enthusiasm about getting good food to the people, I like rick stein for his curiousty about foreign cuisines and I fall to me knees and touch my head to earth in front of Fearnly Whittingstall
  4. ellen56
  5. gcbranco
    I enjoyed Jacques Pepin and
    Julia Childs shows
  6. juliandavis
    I do give it to Good Eats because of the short interludes they'll have with a food scientist. I too want to learn something from cooking shows.
     
    Then there's the music and orgasmic moaning and groaning or rolling of eyes when food is tasted, which does in fact sound/look like '70's porn films. Like all "reality" shows, they'll use the same contrived music to suggest urgency, tension, as if something really important is going on and then there's the tough-guy postures during introductions where the arms are crossed and chest's puffed up. I find too that the best shows seem to be on public television. All of the restaurant rescue show are ridiculous, all using the same template.
  7. chefmikeb
    The best of Food TV starts and ends with Alton Brown and "Good Eats", with America's Test Kitchen a close second, and Julia third. Todays food tv is piffle made of anger, contrived drama, screaming, swearing and behavior that we wouldn't tolerate in a frat house, much less a million dollar business. Sadly, even Top Chef seems to be lowering itself, looking for more fake drama and lowered skill sets.
  8. chefmannydlm
    I gotta tell you PBS does a really good job with its food related shows.  Anthony Bourdain is a personal hero of mine.  I love everything he does except for The Taste which falls under the food wars category of food TV.
  9. susanne feigum
    I loved David Chang's "Mind of a Chef" PBS show with Anthony Bourdain narrating, more than any of the recent Food Network offerings. I prefer learning something if I am going to watch a food show.